COMPLETE / SETPOLYMARKET ARBITRAGE RESEARCHSource ↗

01 / LIQUIDITY & EXECUTABLE COST

The price is a level.
The cost is a curve.

Walk both sides of a binary complete set. See how quantity, fees and capital carry change an apparent pricing gap.

Best YES ask + NO ask—Only the first displayed level
Depth-weighted pair cost—Both legs / matched quantity
Modeled net difference—After entered fees and carry
Matched / requested pairs—Limited by the smaller book

Walk the asks

A simplified fee charged on both legs’ cost, not a current Polymarket fee schedule. Age above 60 seconds blocks the scenario.

One level per line. Prices in collateral units (0–1). Depth is sorted and duplicate price levels aggregate.

02 / DEPTH SENSITIVITY

Scale can erase the gap.

Modeled net difference ($)

Matched pairs, capped by both books · current cost assumptions

Exact levels consumed at this size

OutcomeAskQuantityCost

Equal YES/NO quantities of the same condition are assumed to form a one-unit complete set. The calculation assumes both legs fill as shown. Leg risk, cancellations, latency, settlement and redemption are not simulated.

03 / PRESERVED RESEARCH ARCHIVE

54 descriptions. Zero executable books.

Loading local archive…

Questions and indicative token prices are historical source material. Dates and activity fields must not be interpreted as current market status.

A probability gap
is not an arbitrage test.

Buying two similarly priced outcomes does not establish a guaranteed payoff. This lab restricts the calculation to matched quantities of complementary YES and NO tokens for one binary condition, then accounts for the actual ask levels needed.

Even a positive modeled difference is conditional on executable liquidity and correct settlement mechanics. It is not a live opportunity or an order instruction.

Complete-set mechanics ↗Prices and order books ↗